Brexit: New UK prime minister, same challenges

The prime minister Theresa May has announced she is stepping down on 7 June

Go to the profile of Karen Ward
May 24, 2019

The prime minister Theresa May has announced she is stepping down on 7 June. Speculation has been mounting and sterling has fallen 3.4% against the dollar in the last three weeks. The market clearly associates the news with an increased likelihood of either a hardline Brexiteer leading the UK towards “no deal” exit from the European Union (EU), or a general election that paves the way for a potentially less market-friendly Labour government. Below we highlight why neither scenario seems likely.

The path to no deal, or a general election

The steps below seem necessary for the UK to leave the EU with no deal.

  1. The Tory leadership contest (which could take about two months) results in the appointment of a pro-Brexit Prime Minister.
  2. The new leader proposes a harder Brexit to the UK population which receives strong support. The Conservatives rise significantly in the polls providing the new Prime Minister with the confidence to call a general election.
  3. The Conservatives win on a landslide big enough to materially change the balance of opinion within the UK Parliament towards support for no deal.
  4. On 31 October the UK’s current extension with the EU expires and there is no parliamentary majority to prevent no deal happening in the way we have seen from Parliament so far.

The charts below highlight the flaws in this narrative. Exhibit 1 from a YouGov survey on 10 April shows that 30% of the population are in favour of no deal. A higher proportion are in favour of remaining in the EU.

Exhibit 1: If you had to choose one outcome of Brexit, what would you prefer to see?

% of respondents

Exhibit 2 compares recent party polls with the polls a year ago. We can see that both the Conservatives and Labour are losing support as those in favour of a hard Brexit are showing their support for the new Brexit Party, while those in favour of a softer Brexit or remain are gravitating towards the Liberal Democrats or Change UK.

Exhibit 2: General election voting intentions

% of respondents

These polls could change in the event of a charismatic leader. But in our view they merely represent the deep-rooted Brexit divisions in the UK population that have been evident since June 2016 when 52% voted to leave and 48% of the population voted to remain. Neither side appears to have changed its mind very much (indeed in another recent poll 75% of the population are still sure they voted the right way) but not all those that voted to leave want to leave without a deal.

As a result it seems doubtful that the polls would inspire the new prime minister with the confidence to call an election, so the market looks to be overpricing the chance of a Labour government in the near term under its current configuration.

What about the chance of a new prime minister running down the clock and the UK “crashing out” on 31 October? We think this is unlikely for three reasons. First, unless there is a reconfiguration of parliament, MPs will once again prevent it happening. Second, we do not believe that the most likely contenders to be the new prime minister (Boris Johnson and Dominic Raab) would risk taking the country towards no deal without a clear mandate from the population. There are economic risks, at least in the short-term, they may not wish to be responsible for, as well as risks to the Union of Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and England (recall that both voted for the Theresa May’s deal at the last vote).

Finally, we do not believe the EU will refuse a further extension. Indeed, the EU has demonstrated that it is similarly adverse to no deal. Also, while a large proportion of the UK population support a new referendum, the EU is more likely to hold out to see if, after all this time and fuss, the UK changes its mind and remains in the EU.

In summary, while the latest news provides ample fodder for dramatic headlines, until the UK population materially shifts its position one way or another, it seems unlikely the position of UK parliament will change. The situation will remain that there is not a majority for no deal.

Our core scenario has always been that a compromise that delivers on control of migration and budget contributions, but concedes to accepting EU rules and regulations on goods to protect economic supply chains and prevent a hard border in Ireland, will be the final outcome. Such a deal would be a customs union for goods. However, we have very little conviction at all about how long it will take to get there.

While this is hardly good news for the UK economy or asset markets – the additional risk premium that has built in recent weeks seems unjustified. In the coming months we are likely to find out that a new prime minister hasn’t actually changed the outlook at all.

For more insights click here


Find out more about our UK capabilities

The Market Insights programme provides comprehensive data and commentary on global markets without reference to products. Designed as a tool to help clients understand the markets and support investment decision-making, the programme explores the implications of current economic data and changing market conditions.

For the purposes of MiFID II, the JPM Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programmes are marketing communications and are not in scope for any MiFID II / MiFIR requirements specifically related to investment research. Furthermore, the J.P. Morgan Asset Management Market Insights and Portfolio Insights programmes, as non-independent research, have not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research, nor are they subject to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of investment research. This document is a general communication being provided for informational purposes only. It is educational in nature and not designed to be taken as advice or a recommendation for any specific investment product, strategy, plan feature or other purpose in any jurisdiction, nor is it a commitment from J.P. Morgan Asset Management or any of its subsidiaries to participate in any of the transactions mentioned herein. Any examples used are generic, hypothetical and for illustration purposes only. This material does not contain sufficient information to support an investment decision and it should not be relied upon by you in evaluating the merits of investing in any securities or products. In addition, users should make an independent assessment of the legal, regulatory, tax, credit, and accounting implications and determine, together with their own professional advisers, if any investment mentioned herein is believed to be suitable to their personal goals. Investors should ensure that they obtain all available relevant information before making any investment. Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out are for information purposes only, based on certain assumptions and current market conditions and are subject to change without prior notice. All information presented herein is considered to be accurate at the time of production, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability in respect of any error or omission is accepted. It should be noted that investment involves risks, the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreements and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yields are not a reliable indicator of current and future results. J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our EMEA Privacy Policy

This communication is issued in Europe (excluding UK) by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l., 6 route de Trèves, L-2633 Senningerberg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, R.C.S. Luxembourg B27900, corporate capital EUR 10.000.000. This communication is issued in the UK by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England No. 01161446. Registered address: 25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP.

Material ID 0903c02a8256a372

Go to the profile of Karen Ward

Karen Ward

Chief Strategist for EMEA, J.P. Morgan Asset Management

Karen Ward, Managing Director, is the Chief Strategist for EMEA for J.P. Morgan Asset Management. She delivers insight into the economy and financial markets to thousands of professional investors across the UK, Europe and globally. Karen has considerable experience in both public policymaking and economic and financial analysis. She started her career at the Bank of England providing supporting analysis for the Monetary Policy Committee. She joined HSBC Global Banking and Markets in 2006 as Chief UK Economist. She was promoted to Senior Global Economist where her work included The World in 2050 - an analysis of the structural changes affecting the global economy and the rise of the emerging economies. Karen was appointed Chief European Economist in 2014. In 2016 she was appointed Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers for the Chancellor of the Exchequer. In this role she advised the Chancellor on macroeconomic issues including fiscal strategy and Brexit. Karen has a Masters with Distinction in Economics from University College London.

No comments yet.