Brexit: Endgame part II

The government’s European Union (EU) Withdrawal Agreement was rejected for the second time in parliament yesterday. James Illsley gives his opinion on what happens next.

Go to the profile of James Illsley
Mar 13, 2019

To read part I, please click here

The government’s European Union (EU) Withdrawal Agreement was rejected for the second time in parliament yesterday (12 March).  Theresa May’s deal was rejected by 391 votes to 242, which is an improvement from the January vote, but is still a resounding defeat. After the Attorney General, Geoffrey Cox, delivered his legal opinion that the UK could theoretically still be trapped in a customs union with the EU indefinitely, the rejection of the deal was probably not a surprise.

Reflecting the view that a rejection of the deal was expected, markets are relatively sanguine this morning (13 March). Using sterling as a barometer of market sentiment, the currency now sits at USD 1.315, up 0.6% on the day and about 1% on the week. Key bellwether domestic sectors, such as housebuilders and banks, have not reacted significantly (as at 8.40am). Berkeley Group is down 0.3%, Taylor Wimpey down 0.9%, Royal Bank of Scotland is flat and Lloyds Banking Group is down 0.4%, for instance.

What next?

The vote on a “no-deal” exit is expected to be defeated comfortably in parliament today (13 March), then MPs will vote on Thursday (14 March) to ask for an extension to Article 50, which mandates that the UK leaves the EU by 29 March 2019. Again, expectations are that this vote will be passed comfortably.

Assuming the vote to extend Article 50 is passed, then the prime minister will relay that request to the EU. Any extension to Article 50 requires unanimous approval of the EU’s 27 member states. Again, the assumption is that the EU will grant this request but clearly there must be some uncertainty. The EU Council meeting on 21 March is the likely forum in which any request to extend Article 50 will be discussed and potentially approved. Importantly, however, the duration of the extension granted is uncertain. It could be a short extension (say three months), which limits the options and also bridges the date of the next set of EU parliamentary elections beginning on Thursday 23 May, in which the UK is not due to participate. As indicated previously, the possible outcomes from a short extension could include:

  • An eventual passing of the Withdrawal Agreement

  • A “softer” Brexit, such as a customs agreement

  • Revoking Article 50 (the European Court of Justice has guided that the UK could unilaterally take this step)

  • Accepting a no-deal exit

A longer extension to Article 50 could require the UK to take part in the EU elections, but it would increase the options available to include a general election or a second referendum.

It should be noted that the default legal position as the situation currently stands is that the UK leaves the EU on 29 March. Something would need to change to move that date. The UK would have to seek an extension and the EU agree to it, or the UK would need to revoke Article 50.

More to follow!

Sources: Bloomberg, BBC, Exane BNP Paribas. 

 To read part III please click here

James Illsley is the portfolio manager for the JPM UK Equity Core Fund


Find out more about our UK capabilities

For Professional Clients only – not for Retail use or distribution

This is a marketing communication and as such the views contained herein are not to be taken as an advice or recommendation to buy or sell any investment or interest thereto. Reliance upon information in this material is at the sole discretion of the reader. Any research in this document has been obtained and may have been acted upon by J.P. Morgan Asset Management for its own purpose. The results of such research are being made available as additional information and do not necessarily reflect the views of J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Any forecasts, figures, opinions, statements of financial market trends or investment techniques and strategies expressed are, unless otherwise stated, J.P. Morgan Asset Management’s own at the date of this document. They are considered to be reliable at the time of writing, may not necessarily be all inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. They may be subject to change without reference or notification to you. It should be noted that the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Past performance and yield are not a reliable indicator of current and future results. There is no guarantee that any forecast made will come to pass. J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldwide. To the extent permitted by applicable law, we may record telephone calls and monitor electronic communications to comply with our legal and regulatory obligations and internal policies. Personal data will be collected, stored and processed by J.P. Morgan Asset Management in accordance with our EMEA Privacy Policy This communication is issued in Europe (excluding UK) by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l., 6 route de Trèves, L-2633 Senningerberg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, R.C.S. Luxembourg B27900, corporate capital EUR 10.000.000. This communication is issued in the UK by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Registered in England No. 01161446. Registered address: 25 Bank Street, Canary Wharf, London E14 5JP 0903c02a8253612e

Go to the profile of James Illsley

James Illsley

Fund Manager, JPM UK Equity Core Fund and JPM UK Equity Plus Fund, J.P. Morgan Asset Management

James Illsley is a portfolio manager of the JPM UK Equity Core Fund and the JPM UK Equity Plus Fund within J.P. Morgan Asset Management's UK Equity team.

No comments yet.